Immigration Policies and the Sustainment of Federal Employees

            All types of employees in the federal government rely on the disenfranchising of immigrants for the sustainment of their jobs.  Lawmakers, law enforcers, clerical people, lawyers, transportation people, and Department of State practitioners all contribute to the discrimination towards immigrants and the immigration policies that the United States was founded upon, and are able to maintain employment because of it, that is.  Recently, the Hispanic/Latino migrants have become the solution for these federal employees to retain their paychecks and benefits, while simultaneously suggesting that they (federal employees) are adhering to the many federal laws and immigration policies.  This is complete bullshit, and the people in these positions should be ashamed of themselves for participating in government-based ethnic biases and organized slavery via the prison-industrial complex in the United States.  The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy is being presented as a new social issue in this country when, in fact, it is not.  Politicians in the United States are, once again, using social fear to instill hatred and division between citizens in order to appear coherent to Americans’ concerns and faulty cries about safety.  This immigration policy is old news, and it should have been dealt with decades ago given the premises of the provisions within DACA.  Why did no other politicians in the past comprehend that children who entered the country illegally and were growing up in the United States – mostly because of parental concerns about providing a better life for their children – not deserve some type of clemency?  It took decades to realize this?  What about the young immigrant children now?  They are being discriminated against because of the incoherence about immigration in the United States and the policymakers who decided to ignore the issue – which includes both Democrats and Republicans.

Negotiating with the Trump administration is callous and weak-minded policy making that is centered on Democrats wanting be viewed as saviors for these unfortunate people (undocumented immigrants).  Caving to the idea of building a wall on the Southwest border and more stringent immigration policies does two things for the Blue Team, which are: 1.)  It makes the Democrats look prejudiced to future Hispanic/Latino migrants who are seeking better livelihoods, and 2.) Careless in their understanding of commonsense activities.  That is, the bargain is being resolved with ideas of being more liberal towards current aliens (suggested aliens in this case, when it is more like Americans who are Brown and undocumented and should be citizens regardless of context) and, in turn, discriminating against future ethnicities via the use of tangible means – building a wall.  How can the Democrats not realize that the funding of such a massive project will have financial difficulties that will delay the onset of its finality, as well as not understand that building such a massive wall would most likely not be finished by 2020?  Understandings about political leverage for the Democrats are nowhere to be found.  Second to this, simplistic deliverances by the Democrats are not being discussed or presented.  Which is the discussion about how immigrants will go through, under, and over the wall – which is already going on in areas that have a wall in place – in the same ways that they do now with tunnels, boats, planes, and loopholes in security checkpoints.  Are we really going to build a wall right behind or in the middle of the Rio Grande, in the New Mexico and Arizona deserts, and in urban areas in Southern California?  That is what all of this wall talk implies. 

  

Moreover, the entire West coast, Northeast coast, Mideast coast, Southeast coast, and states that lie in the Gulf of Mexico will not have a wall.  So, how will the wall in the Southwest deter immigrants from using resources to enter the United States in these areas?  Is it not palatable to suggest that if security is being beefed up in one area that the people who are trying to enter the country will simply go to the areas where there is no massive ongoing construction project?  Once more, the Democrats are caving to a bullshit deal without presenting any of the critical viewpoints that are above-mentioned and failed to realize that they could have stalled the DACA issues and used the ideas that have been mentioned for the 2020 election and, possibly, have their policies implemented.  Brilliant minds.  Is anyone else starting to think that the Democrats may not be as liberal as they suggest?  Maybe some closet prejudices that are being shown via the nonchalant acceptance of walls on borders that are associated with Brown people?  Why do the politicians not strive to build a wall across the massive Canadian border?  Gentrification?  Racism? Ethnic biases?  The problem only exists in the Southwest and not in any other areas in the United States?  Bullshit!  The Democrats seriously screwed themselves over with their acquiescence in this matter.  What other answer can be forged about this issue other than subtle ethnic biases and the sustainment of federal employment?

 

Immigration detention centers and the United States Border Patrol are most likely the primary lobbyists for these bogus ideas and constructions plans.  Currently, the increase in arrests of undocumented persons, growth in population of immigrant detention facilities, increased revenue for private corporations that cater to correctional facilities, talks about increased budgets for the immigration agencies, and overtime pay are all benefits for these specific law enforcers – which of course are the reasons they are not speaking out against the stupidity involved in the DACA deal.  There are no negative impacts for these federal employees.  Getting more money to play around with is the real reason that no Immigration and Customs Enforcement or Border Patrol employees posit reasonable political and occupational conveyances.  As aforementioned, other federal employees are reaping the benefits of the crappy policy and deal making as well.  Lawyers – defense attorneys, prosecutors, and judges – have all had much to do because of the recent decisions to be ethnically biased towards Hispanic/Latino people.  Capital and occupational worth is being received and retained because of the policies in the DACA deal and social fear that the Republicans and Democrats have initiated into our society.  Turning to corrections officers, they are not having to worry about shift hours or salary cut-backs because the cops are arresting people and sending them to their institutions – occupational retention via ethnic biases and imaginary lines; what a great way to feel good about oneself.  This is terrible, America.  Department of State employees are rushing to curtail immigration policies and are using the current form of social chaos to fulfill their employment expectations.  Clerical work is a non-stop effort in these times of Hispanic/Latino disdain and the minions in many organizations are not worrying about employment because of the constant letters, memorandums, emails, scheduling, and phone calls about the ethnic prejudices.  Disgusting!  All of these tasks have subliminal messages of hate associated with them.  Deportation officers and other transportation people have furthered their employment because of the hatred in the land of the free and home of the brave.  Meaning that undocumented immigrants are being transported all over the United States because of the crack-down against Brown people.  The wheels on the bus are definitely going round and round for these federal employees; while simultaneously being paid without fear of lay-offs or feelings about being unnecessary.

In conclusion, there is a massive amount of capitalism that is being projected and sucked up in the United States because of ethnic biases and social fear that is being broadcasted into the society via the public figures and media.  Media companies are not covering the growth of federal employees’ economic status because of the prejudices in the country, and are simply displaying the arguments between political parties and falsely conjured fear that many Americans are suggesting to be concerned about.  Furthermore, the public officials and media companies are doing this even when they advocate for citizenship and liberal immigration policies.  Public officials who are advocates of DACA are subtlety showing Americans the concept of social fear and ethnic biases when they present notions of reaching an agreement that further discriminates against Hispanic/Latino people – via the acceptance of funding and building a wall in the Southwest.  Policy implications for this social issue are easy to describe.  That is, 1.)  Stop being biased towards Hispanic/Latino people who have lived in the United States for many years or were brought to the country without any ability to protest (children tend to follow their parents is what is being implied), 2.)  Building a wall to stop illegal immigration is useless because the flux of immigrants will simply change their methods and paths in order to enter the country, and 3.)  Sustainment of federal occupations related to this issue needs to be ceased and presented in its reality so that ethnic prejudices are greatly diminished and ridiculous political manifestations do not occur.                                

                                          
                                             

                         Source:  Public Domain